Yes, awful terminals demand different editors.

At Amdahl, we had nothing but 3270s for the mainframe UNIX.
Dan Walsh wrote an editor - "ned" - which allowed full screen editing. It was actually quite nice, considering. It allowed any "ed" commands in a command line, but ISPF-like block editing elsewhere.

I wrote the 3270 driver which allowed "almost" full duplex interaction with UNIX.

On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 2:47 PM Ron Natalie <ron@ronnatalie.com> wrote:
Was it one of the awful Pukin-Elmer terminals.  I hated those things.

Then there was the Rand/Interactive Systems INed.   We were stuck using
that when I worked for Martin.

I never learned vi.   If there is no EMACS-like thing on the machine,
then I just use ed (sometimes I can get by with ex/vi in line mode).

The funniest editor story I have is one day I'm working at Martin.   
Having actually heard of UNIX before (let alone having done kernel and
other work) I was sort of the in house expert.   One day one of my
coworkers calls out to me:

"What's all this Bell System crud in the editor?"

I'm thinking, well, it's all Bell System crud.   What specifically are
we talking about.   I walk around to see his terminal and find he has
been typing 1 repeatedly to the shell prompt invoking our /usr/bin/1
that said "One Bell System, It Works."

After that I modded the program to say "You're not in the editor,
Bernie."

It was almost as much fun as putting "You might have mail." in motd.

------ Original Message ------
From: "Steve Simon" <steve@quintile.net>
To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org
Sent: 3/29/2022 3:09:52 PM
Subject: Re: [TUHS] Old screen editors

>
>I never really used it but i do remember an editor called le on the v7 interdata/Perkin Elmer i used at Leeds poly.
>
>I read electronics and we  all used vi, the computer science people at a different campus used le on their Interdata; no idea why.
>
>anyone any background on le? ihave not seen sight nor sound of it since.
>
>-Steve
>



--
- Tom