It appears that Tom Lyon <pugs78@gmail.com> said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Jonathan - awesome!
>Some Princeton timing: the 360/67 arrived in 1967, but was replaced in the
>summer of 1969 by the 360/91.
No, the /67 and /91 were there at the same time. I used them both in high school.
I graduated in 1971 so that must have been 1969 to 71, and when I left I'm pretty
sure both were still there.
R's,
John
>BWK must've got started on the 7094 that preceded the 67, but since it was
>FORTRAN the port wasn't hard.
>Now I wonder what Paul Hilfinger did and whether it was still FORTRAN.
>
>I graduated in 1978, ROFF usage was still going strong!
>
>On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 5:42 PM Jonathan Gray <jsg@jsg.id.au> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 09:45:57PM +0000, segaloco via TUHS wrote:
>> > On Wednesday, July 17th, 2024 at 1:51 PM, segaloco <
>> segaloco@protonmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Just sharing a copy of the Roff Manual that I had forgotten I scanned
>> a little while back:
>> > >
>> > > https://archive.org/details/roff_manual