Grant. I wrote e for Ethernet based ( ip/ tcp ) connections at Masscomp so we didn’t have hack the mailer at time.
On 7/3/20 2:52 PM, Adam Thornton wrote:
> I've built UUCP, set a node name, and set it up on the pi.
>
> I can execute uucico to send files, and it, frustratingly, almost works.
Which system are you referring to here? The Pi or V7?
> From the Pi side, I see (with uulog):
>
> uucico v7 - (2020-07-03 08:11:34.97 23106) Calling system v7 (port TCP)
> uucico v7 - (2020-07-03 08:11:42.25 23106) Login successful
> uucico v7 - (2020-07-03 08:11:44.44 23106) Handshake successful
> (protocol 'g' sending packet/window 64/3 receiving 64/7)
> uucico v7 adam (2020-07-03 08:11:51.61 23106) Sending
> /home/adam/git/simh/sim_scsi.h (6780 bytes)
> uucico v7 adam (2020-07-03 08:16:21.79 23106) ERROR: Timed out waiting
> for packet
> uucico v7 - (2020-07-03 08:16:21.80 23106) Protocol 'g' packets: sent
> 86, resent 6, received 1
I'm a little surprised that you're trying to use the 'g' protocol to
talk to v7. I thought the 'g' protocol came out later for TCP over
Ethernet connections. As such I wonder if UUCP on v7 supports the 'g'
protocol.
I think that Clem knows a LOT more about this than I do.
I'm ignorantly asking questions.
> uucico v7 - (2020-07-03 08:16:21.80 23106) Errors: header 2, checksum 0,
> order 0, remote rejects 0
> uucico v7 - (2020-07-03 08:16:22.51 23106) Call complete (283 seconds
> 5440 bytes 19 bps)
>
> So it's clearly logging in, and if I telnet in directly, the v7 end is
> starting uucico as expected:
>
> login: pi-uucp
> Password:
> Shere
Shouldn't that be something more like the following?
Shere=v7
What does 'uuname -l' (or '--local') show? (I'm much more familiar with
Taylor UUCP than I am the UUCP in v7.
> uulog -x on the v7 side has no output, and nothing ever appears in the
> spool directory, which I suspect is a direct result of the timeout
> waiting for packet.
>
> So my question is, what else do I do to debug this? Clearly the pi
> (Taylor UUCP) side is expecting something else--maybe an
> acknowledgement?--from the v7 side to let it know the transmission was
> successful.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
I've not messed with this particular problem in probably 2 years and
I've forgotten more than comments above.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
--
Sent from a handheld expect more typos than usual