Moving to COFF

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 7:56 PM John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> wrote:
Rereading that made me wonder: if someone retargeted an old compiler (pcc, say) to produce i386 code,
I thought SVR3's was PCC (maybe PCC2).  But I thought I remember that is had a i386 code.  Certainly by SVR4 time.
IIRC, the time frame of SVR3's front end would have been original ANSI (i.e. White Book V2).
 
how much faster would it run than a VAX? 
In the time frame of the SVR3 (mid/late 80s), the Intel processors was faster than the 1MIP (780 circa 1977) in raw computes.  The issue was always I/O.  Most PC did not have the same amount of I/O HW that much earlier Vaxen. 


 
I see that there is a pcc derivative at <http://pcc.ludd.ltu.se/>, but supposedly it has been heavily rewritten for C99 compliance and other things.
And my point is that by the time of C99, it was a different language than the early 1970s when Dennis created fit or the original PDP-11/20  he and Ken used for the first UNIX kernel and tools implementations.

"When I read commentary about suggestions for where C should go, I often think back and give thanks that it wasn't developed under the advice of a worldwide crowd." dmr