Are you guys talking about “A formal description of System/360” by Falkoff, Iverson and Sussenguth? It uses an APL like notation but not exactly a S/360 emulator in APL! Much more concise than the S/360 POP.

http://www.cs.trinity.edu/~jhowland/class.files.cs2321.html/falkoff.pdf

On Nov 18, 2019, at 8:43 AM, Clem Cole <clemc@ccc.com> wrote:




On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 12:14 AM Dave Horsfall <dave@horsfall.org> wrote:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2019, Peter Jeremy wrote:

> More than just the instruction set - IBM published a formal description
> of the S/360 (in APL in the IBM Systems Journal issue that announced the
> S/360).  The S/360 was (I believe) the first case where a company
> announced a computer architecture (rather than an implementation) and
> implementations were expected to precisely comply with the architecture
> (no more finding undocumented instructions and side-effects and writing
> code that depended on them).  This meant that clone makers could build a
> clone that accurately emulated a S/360.

Ah, I'd forgotten about the APL documentation; thanks!  Talk about giving
away the keys to the kingdom: Amdahl, Fujitsu, Hitachi...

The cat was already out and poking around with the publishing of:  IBM 360 Principles of Operation, DOC A22-6821-0. The APL version of spec just gave it more area to roam.
_______________________________________________
COFF mailing list
COFF@minnie.tuhs.org
https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/coff