On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 3:43 PM Grant Taylor via COFF <coff@minnie.tuhs.org> wrote:
Thank you for the comments gentlemen.
Most welcome. 

What I think I'm hearing you say is that with RPN you were shouldering
part of the computational load based on how you were entering things so
that they aligned as necessary with the stack.  Conversely, you were
simply "plug and chug" (as I've heard elsewhere).  Meaning you entered
the equation / formula and were largely hands off from the calculation.

Is that accurate?
Fair enough.