Mangled and non-mangled TUHS mail lists

Steve Nickolas usotsuki at buric.co
Tue Oct 3 12:19:02 AEST 2017


On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Dave Horsfall wrote:

> On Mon, 2 Oct 2017, David Ryskalczyk wrote:
>
>> For lists the alter the From: line, I prefer if they put the original From: 
>> address in the Cc: line as that means a reply-all goes both to the list and 
>> the originator. However I'm not sure whether this will cause DKIM issues as 
>> well (I haven't dug deep enough).
>
> I really hate it when people use reply-all and are too lazy to edit the 
> recipient list; I get my copy via the list, thank you, and I don't need my 
> own personal copy as well (there's a reason for the Reply-To: header).

For me at least, in such cases, I have never gotten duplicates.

-uso.


More information about the TUHS mailing list