[TUHS] Another odd comment in V6
pnr at planet.nl
Wed Feb 15 00:35:46 AEST 2017
On 14 Feb 2017, at 15:14 , Noel Chiappa wrote:
>> From: Paul Ruizendaal
>> Actually, research Unix does save the complete state of a process and
>> could back up the PC. The reason that it doesn't work is in the syscall
>> API design, using registers to pass values etc. If all values were
>> passed on the stack it would work.
> Sorry, I don't follow this?
> The problem with 'backing up the PC' is that you 'sort of' have to restore the
> arguments to the state they were in at the time the system call was first
> made. This is actually easier if the arguments are in registers.
Yeah, you're right. I was thinking of the 2.9BSD code which only does the backup
in certain cases and when stack parameter mode was used (the 0200 bit), but
stating it like I did is indeed incomplete to say the least.
Another difficulty in stock V6 would be code like this:
where the data at label 9: could be overwritten by a signal handler
and re-executing the sys call would not work as intended.
More information about the TUHS