[TUHS] V7 Addendem
jon at fourwinds.com
Thu Dec 7 02:15:20 AEST 2017
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017, at 20:07, Warren Toomey wrote:
> > Ken tried to send it out, but the lawyers kept
> > stalling and stalling and stalling.
> > When the lawyers found out about it, they called every
> > licensee and threatened them with dire consequences if they
> > didn’t destroy the tape, after trying to find out how they got
> > the tape. I would guess that no one would actually tell them
> > how they came by the tape (I didn’t).
> I have a question, if anyone has any idea... is there any recorded
> knowledge about *who was driving*? That is, beyond "the lawyers", who on
> the business side of AT&T was making the policy decisions that led to
> the various sometimes bizarre legal actions that caused problems for the
> Unix world, and to what end (was there some way they expected to profit?
> liability concerns?)
> In other words, what was the basis of the legal department's mandate to
> try to shut these things down? (This question is also something I've
> wondered for some non-Unix stuff like the E911 document, but that's not
> relevant to this list)
Can't answer your question directly, but I think that some of this was
the result of the prior consent decree banning them from being in the
data business. I seem to recall that it was technically illegal for
them to sell SW and don't know how giving it away would have been viewed.
More information about the TUHS